When Margaret Chen signed up to donate her body to science, she imagined medical students learning anatomy from her remains. She imagined gratitude. She imagined purpose.
What she didn't imagine was that her torso would be leased to a medical device company for $3,500, her right leg sold to a surgical training seminar for $1,800, and her head shipped — without her family's knowledge — to a private research facility in another state.
But that is precisely what happened, according to a 2025 investigative report by Reuters that traced the dispersal of 12 donated bodies through the U.S. body brokerage system.
A Regulatory Vacuum
Body donation in the United States exists in a regulatory gray zone that few Americans understand. Organ donation is governed by strict federal rules under the National Organ Transplant Act. Tissue donation — corneas, skin, bone — falls under FDA oversight.
But whole-body donation — donating your intact remains for medical education and research — is regulated primarily at the state level, if at all. Only 11 states require body brokers to be licensed. There is no federal agency tracking how many bodies are donated, where they go, or what happens to the parts.
The result is an industry that operates with remarkable freedom. Body brokers — also called "non-transplant tissue banks" — obtain donated bodies (often for free), dissect them into parts, and sell or lease those parts to medical device companies, surgical training programs, and research institutions. A single body can generate $10,000 to $50,000 in revenue when fully disassembled.
How the Business Works
The economics are straightforward and, to many observers, disturbing:
Acquisition. Brokers obtain bodies for free from donors or families. Some brokers charge families a "processing fee" of $500–$1,000, which is still far less than the cost of a funeral.
Segmentation. Bodies are dismembered into component parts — heads, torsos, arms, legs, hands, spines. Each part has a market price.
Distribution. Parts are sold or leased to end users. Heads and torsos are particularly valuable for surgical training. Extremities are used by medical device companies for product testing.
Profit. The broker keeps the difference. There is no standard pricing. There is no requirement to inform families about what happened to specific body parts.
The Arthur Rathburn Case
The industry's most infamous case exposed how badly oversight had failed. Arthur Rathburn, a Michigan body broker, was sentenced to nine years in federal prison in 2018 after investigators discovered he had been renting out body parts infected with HIV and hepatitis to medical training events. He had obtained the bodies from mortuary programs and donation services, falsely representing himself as a legitimate anatomical donation organization.
The case prompted congressional hearings and calls for reform. But the reforms have been slow and incomplete.
Donor Consent: A Murky Concept
The central ethical problem in body brokerage is consent. Most donation forms are vague about what "donating your body to science" actually entails. They rarely mention that the body may be dismembered, that parts may be sold to for-profit companies, or that remains may be shipped across the country — or internationally.
A 2024 analysis of 62 body donation consent forms, published in the *Annals of Internal Medicine*, found that 73% did not clearly state that remains might be dismembered and sold commercially. Only 12% specified that parts could be used by for-profit companies. Just 8% guaranteed that remains would stay within the donor's home state.
For families, the gap between expectation and reality can be devastating. Several high-profile lawsuits have been filed by families who learned — sometimes years later — that their loved one's remains were handled in ways they never would have agreed to.
The Military Connection
One of the body brokerage industry's most significant customers is the U.S. Department of Defense. Military medical training programs require anatomical specimens for combat surgery training, blast injury research, and equipment testing.
A 2023 investigation by The Washington Post found that the Pentagon had spent more than $14 million on body parts from brokers over the previous decade. Some of those parts came from donors whose consent forms made no mention of military use.
The military's reliance on body brokers raises questions about whether donors would willingly support certain types of research — including weapons testing and explosive trauma simulation — if they knew about it.
What Reform Looks Like
Several states have tightened regulations in recent years. Colorado passed the country's most stringent body broker law in 2023, requiring licensing, inspections, and detailed consent forms. Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon have followed with similar legislation.
At the federal level, a bipartisan bill introduced in 2025 — the Safe Body Donation Act — would create a national registry of body brokers, mandate standardized consent forms, and give the FDA oversight authority. The bill has broad support from medical ethicists and consumer advocates but faces opposition from industry trade groups.
The Ethical Crossroads
Nobody disputes that medical training requires anatomical specimens. Surgical residents need to practice on real tissue. Medical device companies need to test implants on actual bone. Researchers need human remains to study disease.
The question is not whether body donation should exist. It's whether the system that manages it should be allowed to operate in shadows — profiting from generosity while obscuring the truth from the people who gave.
Margaret Chen's family filed a lawsuit in 2024. They're not seeking money. They're seeking information: where are the rest of her remains? What was she used for? Who profited?
As of this writing, they're still waiting for answers.
*Sources: Reuters investigative report, "The Body Trade," 2025; Washington Post investigation / DoD procurement records, 2023; Annals of Internal Medicine, "Informed Consent in Whole-Body Donation," 2024; National Conference of State Legislatures body broker regulation tracking, 2025; U.S. v. Arthur Rathburn, Eastern District of Michigan, 2018.*
Get investigations like this in your inbox
Free. Every Tuesday.